<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Difference Between Science &#038; Art</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sideofsauce.com/art-design/the-difference-between-science-art/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sideofsauce.com/art-design/the-difference-between-science-art/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Art Vs Science: 5 Reasons Blogging Is An Art Form &#124; Blogging Fingers</title>
		<link>http://sideofsauce.com/art-design/the-difference-between-science-art/#comment-3271</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Vs Science: 5 Reasons Blogging Is An Art Form &#124; Blogging Fingers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sideofsauce.com/?p=5#comment-3271</guid>
		<description>[...] Side Of Sauce concludes that, &#8220;Science is about right and wrong and finding the truth, art is about winning the popular vote&#8220;. (emphasis is mine). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Side Of Sauce concludes that, &#8220;Science is about right and wrong and finding the truth, art is about winning the popular vote&#8220;. (emphasis is mine). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yousaf</title>
		<link>http://sideofsauce.com/art-design/the-difference-between-science-art/#comment-2831</link>
		<dc:creator>Yousaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 03:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sideofsauce.com/?p=5#comment-2831</guid>
		<description>It is one of the most unique and expressive articles I have seen on the subject, very well articulated and focused on the subject.
It is a question that has haunted me for a long time. In the end, I have come to conclude, that both of these approaches need to coexist for development of civilization. While one models the deterministic aspect of the universe, other models the chaotic behavior. Neither one is right or wrong. Both are so interrelated, that we can not demarcate them. To sum it up, science is a predefined set of inputs that produces predictable outputs while art is blend of many sciences to the extent that a similar set of inputs can produce completely different results based on factors that are affecting a phenomena non-linearly or sometimes even contradictorily. I guess that is how God chooses to manifest His wisdom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is one of the most unique and expressive articles I have seen on the subject, very well articulated and focused on the subject.<br />
It is a question that has haunted me for a long time. In the end, I have come to conclude, that both of these approaches need to coexist for development of civilization. While one models the deterministic aspect of the universe, other models the chaotic behavior. Neither one is right or wrong. Both are so interrelated, that we can not demarcate them. To sum it up, science is a predefined set of inputs that produces predictable outputs while art is blend of many sciences to the extent that a similar set of inputs can produce completely different results based on factors that are affecting a phenomena non-linearly or sometimes even contradictorily. I guess that is how God chooses to manifest His wisdom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
